Homework - comparative analysis.
What language differences are there of the transport cafe menu and the hotel menu?

The texts I have looked at are the Menu B, while discussing its lexical features, and text A (Wayfarer cafe)

Text B involves a menu in which its vocabulary tends to be in a more formal, and sophisticated context, therefore the audience could perhaps be those who are generally in formal situations and has experience in dealing sophisticated cuisine type of expressions due to its high level of vocabulary. Whereas in contrast text B could mainly be aimed at Looking at the menu, there happens to be a great number of noun phrases, such as 'peeled prawns' in which gives the reader a greater imagination of the food, as well as giving a type of impact that would allow them to read on further, We can see that the text involves a great amount of cuisines, therefore it is obvious that the text maintain the lexical field of food, similar to text B which also maintains the lexical field of food, however the different types of food advertised on the menu happen to be slightly contrasting. for example, text B maintains more northern traditional food in which a reader may arrive into a shop and generally take the food away and contextually may cost slightly cheaper, whereas within the Text A - it shows a more variety of complex filled foods in which have been described in a more sumptuous and elegant way, in which would generally be more expensive and be in a setting in which you may have to book seats formally. The graphological aspects are a key too within text A and B. In text A, it is seen that the use of capitalization have been utilized in order to perhaps attract the local readers, whereas in text B it has utilized a more formal, italic type in order for readers to receive a great first impression of the restaurant.